| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
The Alternative Antenna-Theory.com Newbie
Joined: 04 Aug 2009 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:23 am Post subject: Antenna gain |
|
|
Antenna gain is usually given with relationship to a known antenna (such as a dipole or a isotropic). To give one example: a dipole has a gain of 2.5dbi.
However, I notice that many antenna modeling programs give a gain figure. This figure seems to be far too high. Just what is that these programs provide? How do they calculate the gain figure? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 247
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:52 am Post subject: Gain |
|
|
Hmmm...what program are you using?
A good check to see if your using the program right (and to make sure the program runs correctly), is to perform the analysis on a simple half-wave dipole. The directivity and gain should both be roughly 2.15 dB or less, and if its much higher than something isn't correct. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gelunmak Antenna Theory Regular
Joined: 05 Jun 2009 Posts: 17 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've the same experience of having incorrect gain value when using some simulations software.
Of course, i tried to use a simple dipole to test the software but the value is higher than the expected value of 2.15dBi.
So i don't rely too much on the gain value, instead i'll look at other parameter like beamwith, F/B ratio, shape of pattern, S11, S21 , ... etc.
Simulation software for me is design aid which help to confirm some new idea or to predict the performance before actually build the antenna.
I trust and rely more on experiment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|