Antenna - Theory .com: The Antenna Site

Antenna Basics Antenna Types Smith Charts Antenna Measurements

antenna-theory.com :: View topic - maxwell's equations
antenna-theory.com Forum Index antenna-theory.com
Antenna Theory
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

maxwell's equations

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    antenna-theory.com Forum Index -> Questions Related to Antenna Theory
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
junaid
Antenna-Theory.com Newbie


Joined: 14 Jun 2013
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:56 am    Post subject: maxwell's equations Reply with quote

i want solve one simple circuit with 1 resistor and 1 capacitor with supply voltage and want to solve that circuit with the help of maxwell's equation (NOT WITH THE CIRCUIT THEORY). please help me how to handel this task. please try to reply as early as possible.
thank you.
Sad Sad Sad Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bigSteve
Antenna Wizard


Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 265

PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You have to simplify the equations. Resistance will be related to the sigma term (conductivity). Capacitance is related to the displacement current density term. Current is analogous to the magnetic field or current density. Electric Field is analogous to voltage. Try to make ohms law from maxwell's equations (V=IR becomes J=sigma*E), then work from there.

See www.maxwells-equations.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
arka
Antenna Theory Regular


Joined: 19 Mar 2013
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

after converting to analogous EM quantities, use del X E = -dB/dt as generalized KVL and del.J = -d(rho)/dt , i.e. the continuity equation as generalized KCL..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
CgArnell
Antenna-Theory.com Newbie


Joined: 15 Apr 2014
Posts: 3
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coming to this site and the site about Maxwell's Equations is like a breath of fresh air in a stifled and intellectual classroom. Thanks so much. Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
CgArnell
Antenna-Theory.com Newbie


Joined: 15 Apr 2014
Posts: 3
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maxwell's Equations.
I'm looking at the explanation of 'the curl', in figure 1 clearly talking about the magnetic flux circle of an EM wave... but....the axis of the D is not shown. Is the water flowing on both sides of the D with a vertical axis, or flowing under the D, perhaps with a horizontal axis? More uncertain is how the purple waterwheel of figure 2 might be rotating counter-clockwise, as stated, when the arrows are clearly indicating a circular set of vectors that would produce a clockwise direction.(unless one looks from the underside of the paper)
I'm looking at the math with the simple intent of defining the 'equations of a simple, single photon'.
I believe the single photon equations would simply be a representative divergence charge of 1 and a curl of 1.
I do suspect there will be a 'kinetic, rotational back and forth motion, that should be attributed to the curl equation and to the direction of the electric divergence vector making the arrows represented by the curl slosh back and forth like a washing machine agitator while the charge vector would be pointing out of the paper and then into the paper in sync with the magnetic curl vector rotating back and forth.
Any help will be appreciated. Thank you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
CgArnell
Antenna-Theory.com Newbie


Joined: 15 Apr 2014
Posts: 3
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the D in figure 1 of the 'explanation of the curl' was meant to indicate that the circular set of arrows were meant to indicate a circular charge.. not expected at this point in th explanation.. so I think I have answered my own question about the rotation of 'D'. The rest of my questions are still hanging for now though. Thanks for any help.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
riham
Antenna-Theory.com Newbie


Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 4:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the transmitter's impedance and cable impedance are pretty close (eg 50 ohms) then there shouldn't be much power re-reflected towards the antenna. The transmitter could have an isolater to absorb this reflected energy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    antenna-theory.com Forum Index -> Questions Related to Antenna Theory All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group