Antenna - Theory .com: The Antenna Site

Antenna Basics Antenna Types Smith Charts Antenna Measurements

antenna-theory.com :: View topic - why transmission line can not receive EM wave?
antenna-theory.com Forum Index antenna-theory.com
Antenna Theory
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

why transmission line can not receive EM wave?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    antenna-theory.com Forum Index -> Questions Related to Antenna Theory
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ai.xuexi
Antenna Theory Regular


Joined: 01 Jan 2012
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:27 am    Post subject: why transmission line can not receive EM wave? Reply with quote

In free space, the TEM wave can transmit.

In a pair of parallel plates (transimision line), the mode is also TEM.

Why can not we use the parallel plates to receive the wave?
Why?

you may say the impedance is not match. but how can they be matched?

I find there is no any context about this in textbook.

Thank you very much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
arka
Antenna Theory Regular


Joined: 19 Mar 2013
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:49 pm    Post subject: Reply Reply with quote

Hi..A normal transmission line doesn't radiate TEM waves. It guides TEM waves. Two conditions that are vital for radiation to occur are:
1. There must be a time-changing excitation, which we already have we suppose.

2. The above condition only states a possibility of radiation. Another vital condition which must act is : spatial imbalance.

in normal tx lines, there is no spatial imbalance. currents in both conductors flow in opposite direction. If the conductors are closely spaced, the fields at a far off distance cancel out each other, due to equal and oppositely directed currents on the tx line. (Spatial BALANCE)..

However, when we flare the ends of a transmission line to form a dipole antenna say for instance, the currents at two arms are directed along same directions.. Hence, the fields by the two conductors no more cancel out each other, and adds constructively for radiation (Spatial IMBALANCE)..

Thus, by reciprocity theorem, if we have a structure which can provide spatial imbalance, surely it can receive EM waves as well. But normal parallel plates, or 2-wire tx lines etc., when the conductors are nearly spaced, there is no spatial imbalance. hence cant be used as EM waves receiver.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ai.xuexi
Antenna Theory Regular


Joined: 01 Jan 2012
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply Reply with quote

arka wrote:
Hi..A normal transmission line doesn't radiate TEM waves. It guides TEM waves. Two conditions that are vital for radiation to occur are:
1. There must be a time-changing excitation, which we already have we suppose.

2. The above condition only states a possibility of radiation. Another vital condition which must act is : spatial imbalance.

in normal tx lines, there is no spatial imbalance. currents in both conductors flow in opposite direction. If the conductors are closely spaced, the fields at a far off distance cancel out each other, due to equal and oppositely directed currents on the tx line. (Spatial BALANCE)..

However, when we flare the ends of a transmission line to form a dipole antenna say for instance, the currents at two arms are directed along same directions.. Hence, the fields by the two conductors no more cancel out each other, and adds constructively for radiation (Spatial IMBALANCE)..

Thus, by reciprocity theorem, if we have a structure which can provide spatial imbalance, surely it can receive EM waves as well. But normal parallel plates, or 2-wire tx lines etc., when the conductors are nearly spaced, there is no spatial imbalance. hence cant be used as EM waves receiver.


Your reply is very helpfull for me. I have understood .
however, from my TEM wave point, I still can not understand.
Thank you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    antenna-theory.com Forum Index -> Questions Related to Antenna Theory All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group