| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
shannon Antenna-Theory.com Newbie
Joined: 16 Jun 2011 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:17 am Post subject: Distance between nodes for virtual antenna arrays |
|
|
Hi,
I have inquiry,
In case, if I have cluster of nodes:
The clusterization procedure involves the following steps:
1) Every node broadcasts its ID to its one-hop neighbors. So every node knows the number of its neighbors and their IDs.
2) Every node broadcasts the number of its neighbors to the adjacent nodes.
3) The clusterhead is the node, which has the maximum number of neighbors among the adjacent nodes. If the number of neighbors is similar in several adjacent nodes, the node with the minimum ID will be the clusterhead. The presented algorithm provides that the maximum route distance between nodes in each
cluster is two hops. So the distance between each node in a cluster and clusterhead is one hop.
I consider cluster to be a virtual antenna array with a non-regular structure. The distances between the nodes in the clusters are bigger than in typical antenna arrays, much bigger than the wavelength. These aspects make synchronization inside the clusters a rather complicated problem.
What is a method for evaluating the distance between nodes in this case? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Schubert Antenna Wizard
Joined: 08 Apr 2009 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Use a tape measure |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shannon Antenna-Theory.com Newbie
Joined: 16 Jun 2011 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Schubert wrote: | | Use a tape measure |
node= wireless sensor node
These nodes are assumed to be scattered from an airplane or helicopter , i.e. they can not reach to this place, How you can measure by a tape? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bobby Digital Antenna-Theory.com Newbie
Joined: 14 Jan 2011 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| shannon wrote: | | Schubert wrote: | | Use a tape measure |
How you can measure by a tape? |
Have a friend hold one end for you as you hold the other. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shannon Antenna-Theory.com Newbie
Joined: 16 Jun 2011 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bobby Digital wrote: | | shannon wrote: | | Schubert wrote: | | Use a tape measure |
How you can measure by a tape? |
Have a friend hold one end for you as you hold the other. |
??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wolberine Antenna Theory Regular
Joined: 01 Mar 2011 Posts: 35
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
are you looking for some automated way?
you could try synchronization through timing - similar to how a GPS system works. (or even USE GPS on each device).
each node could time how long it takes to transmit to the other node.
depending on how far away the nodes are and your initial location assumptions, you will have varying degrees of accuracy for a distance magnitude, but a distance vector might be harder to figure out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigSteve Antenna Wizard
Joined: 14 Mar 2009 Posts: 265
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"These nodes are assumed to be scattered from an airplane or helicopter"
I think this statement violates the original first statement:
"Every node broadcasts its ID to its one-hop neighbors. So every node knows the number of its neighbors and their IDs"
If they are thrown out somewhat randomly, the devices cannot themselves figure out who their one hop neighbors are without already knowing the structure.
I think you'll need a system whereby nodes sequentially assume the roll of clusterhead and attempt to process the data from the other nodes. Possibly adding acoustic sensors will allow you to use time-of-arrival delay to estimate position. The problem sounds exquisitely complicated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|