| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
scubasteve Antenna-Theory.com Newbie
Joined: 19 Feb 2017 Posts: 6 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:44 am Post subject: Transmission Line Tutorial from Main Site-Possible Mistake? |
|
|
Hi.
First post here so if I've gotten any of the etiquette wrong please let me know.
In this page from the main site I believe there may be a mistake in the calculation of the 800 ohm input impedance, or if not a clarifying sentence could be made.
Looking at the second to last image, copied below:
In the last line, I believe what is happening is that the real parts of the second expression drop out as they are dominated by the tan(pi/2) terms which tend to infinity. So then the (j) terms drop out leaving you with just 200*inf/(-50*inf) and the infinities drop out. Thus I think the result should be 200*-200/50=-800 rather than positive 800. How could it be positive?
If I am incorrect somewhere can someone please explain where? Or if not could a clarifying statement be added to the tutorial page to explain why the answer is not negative?
Many thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 247
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You are right on the math that tan(beta*L) goes to infinity so it dominates. It looks like the minus sign in the denominator is correct, but there should also be a minus sign in the numerator. The net result though should be positive (you would know something is wrong if input impedance is negative 800 Ohms) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scubasteve Antenna-Theory.com Newbie
Joined: 19 Feb 2017 Posts: 6 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | It looks like the minus sign in the denominator is correct, but there should also be a minus sign in the numerator. |
what causes either term to change from a positive in the first line to a negative in the second line? Why wouldn't they both be positives? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|