Antenna - Theory .com: The Antenna Site

Antenna Basics Antenna Types Smith Charts Antenna Measurements

antenna-theory.com :: View topic - passive UHF RFID tags, Backscattering, S and Z parameters
antenna-theory.com Forum Index antenna-theory.com
Antenna Theory
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

passive UHF RFID tags, Backscattering, S and Z parameters

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    antenna-theory.com Forum Index -> Questions Related to Antenna Theory
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
daneloctober
Antenna-Theory.com Newbie


Joined: 05 Aug 2011
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:53 am    Post subject: passive UHF RFID tags, Backscattering, S and Z parameters Reply with quote

Hello!

I was told that it is not very efficient to use S11 parameters to measure the performance of passive RFID tag antennas and to instead use Z11 parameters. Can anyone tell me why this is so? Thank you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bigSteve
Antenna Wizard


Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 265

PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmm....

I haven't heard that.

But supposing it is true, here is what I would guess may be the reason:

a) RFID is typically very low frequency, and use small antennas. As a result, the antennas aren't so much antennas as big inductors. Hence, the RFID antenna design is less about obtaining an efficient antenna and more about getting a loop with a large enough inductance. Inductors couple together when close together.

b) Since RFID antennas are so small, s11 will be very close to 1 (or 0 dB) because they are so inefficient. Hence, you can't really read on a network analyzer the difference between -0.1 dB and -0.13 dB and really see a difference.

Actually, after writing this I can see why you wouldn't use s11, but rather measure inductance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
daneloctober
Antenna-Theory.com Newbie


Joined: 05 Aug 2011
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the reply!

Though I forgot to mention that we're into UHF RFID applications, which means operating frequencies of about 860-960MHz.

I've started using Z-parameters. Am I just to concern myself with the imaginary impedance component? Because I really can't see much difference in simulation results of the real impedance... I'm using HFSS by the way...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bigSteve
Antenna Wizard


Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 265

PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your probably modeling with perfect conductors so there won't be much for ohmic losses (real). Or if you are using Cu it will be pretty low as well. The real part of the impedance will grow as the radiation efficiency improves. So keep an eye on it. But yeah, the imaginary part (which should be inductive) will be more critical.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    antenna-theory.com Forum Index -> Questions Related to Antenna Theory All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group