## Antenna - Theory .com: The Antenna Site

antenna-theory.com :: View topic - Wavefront Z and TEM cells
antenna-theory.com
Antenna Theory

Author Message
pelican2
Antenna-Theory.com Newbie

Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Location: Santa Barbara California

Schubert
Antenna Wizard

Joined: 08 Apr 2009
Posts: 161

 Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:49 am    Post subject: It is extraordinarily difficult to get repeatable measurements in TEM cells. What exactly do you want to measure with the cell? Antenna efficiency, or ? Basically, you will end up with a resonant cavity. To get an idea how it behaves, consider running a test antenna and the probe antenna cables out into a VNA and measuring S12. You will see a lot of rapid variation. Why do you want 377 Ohms/square? To match the intrinsic impedance of free space? Not sure if the ratio of E/H for plane waves in free space (which will 100% not be the case in a small near field cell) matched to the ratio of V/I will yield what you are looking for. Note: if antennas radiated better when V/I=377 into free space, antennas would be designed to be 377 ohms. They aren't, by the way. People connect intrinsic impedance of a medium and impedance of an antenna with the concept of impedance matching and assume they should be the same.
pelican2
Antenna-Theory.com Newbie

Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Location: Santa Barbara California

 Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:48 pm    Post subject: The main goal is to test receiveing antennas used by radio direction finders. Specifically, to create an RF "wind tunnel" so that wavefronts are traveling in a specific direction, with minimal "cross winds" or "head winds" caused by wall reflections. Absolute measurements are not required, just repeatable conditions with minimal reflections from walls... that is why the 377 ohms per square for the walls. As for the meaning of 377 ohms per square, refer to this article, cited in the first post : http://www.hallikainen.org/rw/insite/WaveZ.pdf Antennas do not have drivepoint Z = 377 ohms because they do not generate collimated plane wavefronts in one specific direction... they generate spherical wavefronts with different field strengths in different directions. ( non - isotropic ) If a vertical dipole radiated ONLY in directions N,E,S and W, ( and ONLY in the horizontal plane ) then the drivepoint Z would be 1/4 x 377 = 94.25 ohms, since the antenna is driving 4 separate 377 ohm paths sinmultaneously. ( like four 377 ohm resistors in parallel ) When the REAL radiation of a dipole is examined ( in ALL directions, to various degrees ) and the power in all the wavefront directions are "summed together" and compared against the drivepoint voltage, the equivalent resistance ( at the drivepoint of the antenna ) equals the "textbook" value of ( I recall ) 73.6 ohms.
R. Fry
Antenna Theory Regular

Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 43
Location: Illinois USA

 Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:21 pm    Post subject: "Z" of Free Space vs. Antenna Feedpoint The impedance of free space is ~377 ohms regardless of the feedpoint impedance of the antenna system radiating that power into free space (and regardless of its radiation pattern). The ratio of the current and voltage for the power applied to every antenna is related to the value of the feedpoint impedance of that antenna configuration, but the far-field E and H components of the power it radiates always is related to 377 ohms. For example the peak, free-space E field of an electrically short dipole radiating 1 watt in a given direction is no different than that of any other antenna configuration radiating 1 watt in that direction -- even though the feedpoint impedances of those antennas may be greatly different.
pelican2
Antenna-Theory.com Newbie

Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Location: Santa Barbara California

 Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:44 pm    Post subject: All very true... and I already knew those facts... but none of it is really on topic. I was suggesting a geometry for a small RF chamber that was similar to TEM cells, but significantly different... something without a sceptum... and soliciting comments on that.
 Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First
 All times are GMT Page 1 of 1

 Jump to: Select a forum The Antenna Forum----------------Questions Related to Antenna TheoryNews
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum