antenna-theory.com

[admin]

Raytheon proudly announced they have developed a miniature antenna for unmanned aircraft.

Here's the thing:

1) Raytheon develop an antenna that is about 1" cubed
2) They say it weighs a fraction of an ounce
3) Operates at millimeter wave frequencies

Ok, so 1" is 25.4 mm. If the wavelength is mm, why is it difficult to place an antenna in such a volume? In fact, it should be trivial. How is this an advancement? Further, in regards to the weight - antennas can be made from thin foil, so how is this an accomplishment?

In summary, this announcement sounds like they did something. But I believe they charged the US government 10-100 million dollars for something a competent antenna engineer could do in a few hours.

Am I wrong? I'd love to hear why what they did was difficult. Article reference below.
http://avstop.com/news_august_2011/raytheon_develops_miniature_antenna_for_unmanned_aircraft_systems.htm

[britny.mark]

have a trivial question: in the short dipole (L<<lambda)
the current distribution on the wire is triangular. That means that the current is flowing in the same direction at every instant of time but it is locally different in strength. At exactly half a cycle in time the current is everywhere zero. After half a cycle, the current change direction.....

Is this current distribution representing a current standing wave or is it a traveling current?

The sign of the current represents its direction which induces me to thing that it is flowing....but then it cannot be a standing wave if it is flowing....

Thanks
tensor20

[cnmcdee]