Antenna - Theory .com: The Antenna Site

Antenna Basics Antenna Types Smith Charts Antenna Measurements

antenna-theory.com :: View topic - Monopole Low-Angle Radiation
antenna-theory.com Forum Index antenna-theory.com
Antenna Theory
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Monopole Low-Angle Radiation

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    antenna-theory.com Forum Index -> Questions Related to Antenna Theory
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
R. Fry
Antenna Theory Regular


Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 49
Location: Illinois USA

PostPosted: Sat Aug 24, 2013 11:51 am    Post subject: Monopole Low-Angle Radiation Reply with quote

For consideration / comment...

Radiation launched by vertical monopoles of 5/8-wavelength and less in height always is maximum in the horizontal plane -- regardless of earth conductivity and the number/length of buried radials they use.

This point is illustrated in the NEC4 analysis below, comparing low-angle radiation for sea water, average, and poor earth conductivity. The shapes of these patterns (their relative fields) are essentially the same, even though the lower conductivities produce lower fields.

The fields present at these elevation angles below ~ 26 degrees can continue on to reach the ionosphere and return to the earth as skywaves. Radiation from the lowest angles provides the greatest single-hop skywave range.

The belief that monopoles need a near-perfect ground plane to radiate high relative fields at low elevation angles is a common interpretation when considering only the far-field patterns shown in NEC and in antenna textbooks as the shape of the fields actually leaving the monopole. But they are not -- they are only what remains of those fields at an infinite distance over an infinite, flat ground plane.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bigSteve
Antenna Wizard


Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 265

PostPosted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So just to be clear the x-axis is received E-field strength (vertical polarization)?

And to reinforce your thesis on "The belief that monopoles need a near-perfect ground plane to radiate high relative fields at low elevation angles is a common interpretation when considering only the far-field patterns shown in NEC and in antenna textbooks as the shape of the fields actually leaving the monopole. But they are not "

Can you plot what the field is over an ideal ground plane?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
R. Fry
Antenna Theory Regular


Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 49
Location: Illinois USA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 1:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bigSteve wrote:
So just to be clear the x-axis is received E-field strength (vertical polarization)?

Correct, for the conditions shown for that NEC model.

Quote:
Can you plot what the field is over an ideal ground plane?

If "ideal" = perfect, essentially the same as the field(s) shown for sea water, for the conditions applying to my graphic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    antenna-theory.com Forum Index -> Questions Related to Antenna Theory All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group