| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
R. Fry Antenna Theory Regular
Joined: 06 Jun 2011 Posts: 49 Location: Illinois USA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 24, 2013 11:51 am Post subject: Monopole Low-Angle Radiation |
|
|
For consideration / comment...
Radiation launched by vertical monopoles of 5/8-wavelength and less in height always is maximum in the horizontal plane -- regardless of earth conductivity and the number/length of buried radials they use.
This point is illustrated in the NEC4 analysis below, comparing low-angle radiation for sea water, average, and poor earth conductivity. The shapes of these patterns (their relative fields) are essentially the same, even though the lower conductivities produce lower fields.
The fields present at these elevation angles below ~ 26 degrees can continue on to reach the ionosphere and return to the earth as skywaves. Radiation from the lowest angles provides the greatest single-hop skywave range.
The belief that monopoles need a near-perfect ground plane to radiate high relative fields at low elevation angles is a common interpretation when considering only the far-field patterns shown in NEC and in antenna textbooks as the shape of the fields actually leaving the monopole. But they are not -- they are only what remains of those fields at an infinite distance over an infinite, flat ground plane.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigSteve Antenna Wizard
Joined: 14 Mar 2009 Posts: 265
|
Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So just to be clear the x-axis is received E-field strength (vertical polarization)?
And to reinforce your thesis on "The belief that monopoles need a near-perfect ground plane to radiate high relative fields at low elevation angles is a common interpretation when considering only the far-field patterns shown in NEC and in antenna textbooks as the shape of the fields actually leaving the monopole. But they are not "
Can you plot what the field is over an ideal ground plane? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
R. Fry Antenna Theory Regular
Joined: 06 Jun 2011 Posts: 49 Location: Illinois USA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bigSteve wrote: | | So just to be clear the x-axis is received E-field strength (vertical polarization)? |
Correct, for the conditions shown for that NEC model.
| Quote: | | Can you plot what the field is over an ideal ground plane? |
If "ideal" = perfect, essentially the same as the field(s) shown for sea water, for the conditions applying to my graphic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|