| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jagadishvakati Antenna-Theory.com Newbie
Joined: 06 Jan 2013 Posts: 7 Location: India
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigSteve Antenna Wizard
Joined: 14 Mar 2009 Posts: 265
|
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Your simulation looks a little screwed up as you have s11 at -2 dB up to 500 MHz, which is a bit odd.
Generally the curve does not look natural. It should be very high for s11 and hten a sharp rolloff for the first frequency (resonance) at a half wavelength. Then you will end up with a 3rd harmonic that is broader band (5.4 GHz roughly), but it should not look like what you have posted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jagadishvakati Antenna-Theory.com Newbie
Joined: 06 Jan 2013 Posts: 7 Location: India
|
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
So is it like should the curve be very high at the initial and then should have a V shaped drop? Am i correct?
So where could we have gone wrong during simulation. I am introducing new substrates values like Mu and Epsilon and doing the simulation like S11, Vswr, radiation efficiency, Total efficiency, Bandwidth. and many more...in the CST software..
And do u think that this software is reliable when doing such variation in Mu and Epsilon values? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|